By Mort Malkin
Arriving at Heathrow on Monday morning, we boarded the train for a short trip to London and the British Museum, not for Lady Thatcher’s funeral on Wednesday. On the ride into London I noticed a few areas of land divided into cultivated plots as if they were community gardens. In London! Here, the People must count for something. My translator-companion told me they were called “allotments,” offered to residents in every city and town in England. Of course, there is generally a waiting list for allotments, but even so.
The magnificent British Museum had no admission charge, but donations are appreciated and memberships are offered. Special shows, such as Ice Age Art, however, require you to purchase tickets and make reservations. I suppose the Nanny State can offer only so much for free, but it is good to see that the government encourages museum attendance.
After two days of museum and two evenings of pubs, came Wednesday morning and a bonus event that is the subject of today’s essay: Maggie Thatcher’s funeral procession. We wended our way down to Fleet Street, newspaper row, where barriers kept pedestrians in their place, on the sidewalks. London Bobbies were everywhere along the procession route. As we walked along the sidewalks behind the two- and three-deep spectators, I noted that in many of the offices across the street, people at work were standing at windows watching. On a few rooftops, others had a bird’s eye view of the event. No roof top snipers were to be seen, though a couple of helicopters looped overhead.
At one point, a company of Welsh Guards in full attire with tall furry bearskin headdress (busbies) marched in formation to the commands of a sergeant major. The sergeant major wielded a great silvery sword, but the guards shouldered semi-automatic AK47s with multiple round magazines. Now, wouldn’t long bows and quivers of arrows have been more in keeping with English tradition?
The Welsh Guards were only one of the Foot Guards who participated in the funeral theatre. Also prominent in similar headdress were Grenadier Guards, Coldstream Guards, Scots Guards … But, it was the Welsh Guards who brought politics into the event. In Maggie Thatcher’s War — the Falklands War (Malvinas to Argentina) — British losses totaled 48 troops, of whom 32 were Welsh Guards.
The politics infused into the funeral came in from various directions. The Right Reverend Richard Chartres, held forth at St. Paul’s Cathedral. In 1982, Chartres had nothing good to say about the Falklands War, opining that war was always, in a sense, a failure, adding that British triumphalism and hubris needed to be tempered. In domestic matters he was an advocate for the environment and a severe critic of unfettered free market capitalism with its culture of greed. Needless to say, he and Prime Minister Thatcher were at opposite sides of the independence–interdependence spectrum. Although a Tory, Chartres became Thatcher’s nemesis. With this history, the Tories were apprehensive about what the outspoken bishop might say at the funeral service. But, Dr. Chartres was wise enough to deliver an eloquent sermon and cloak his critical opinion of Thatcher in great subtlety. He alluded to the sharp disapproval of her policies by many in Parliament and by many average Brits: “After the storm of a life led in the heat of political controversy, there is great calm.” The best he could say of her concerns about the well being of British workers and the average British family was to note her “personal kindness toward those who worked for her.” There was nary a word he could say about her non-existent kindness toward those she worked for — the British people. So, he spoke of her role as a wife, mother, and grandmother.
Less subtle was Glenda Jackson, the actress turned Parliamentarian. She gave Prime Minister Thatcher no credit for having achieved such a high political position: “The first Prime Minister of female gender, OK. But a woman? Not on my terms.” Jackson went on to condemn the ideology that became policy: “Thatcherism wreaked the most heinous social, economic, and spiritual damage on this country.” She also spoke of the economic starving of the schools for the most basic materials such as books, paper and pencils, and of local hospitals “running on empty.” She spoke of the increase in homelessness under Thatcher: The homeless “grew in their thousands. Across the whole country in metropolitan areas, every shop doorway, every single night, became the bedroom, the living room, the bathroom for the homeless.” She summed up: “Everything I had been taught to regard as a vice – and I still regard them as vices – under Thatcherism was in fact a virtue: greed, selfishness, no care for the weaker … it was the way forward.” The Tories were livid at Glenda Jackson’s lack of respect for the dead, but she reported that her many e-mails following the speech were running over ten to one in favor of her commentary. The British public must have memories that reach back past yesterday, remembering that Maggie Thatcher closed the mines of the north, sold off council houses (public housing), privatized British Rail, British Airways, and British Telecom, and restricted the right of the unions — all to temporarily increase government revenues but increase poverty, suffering, and homelessness in the longer term. In equal evility, she deregulated financial markets, and so, established a model for Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, and and Bush & Cheney to follow.
The politics of the funeral went international when the White House declined to send an official emissary to the event. But, the US was not without representation — Dick Cheney and Henry Kissinger came over to celebrate the memory of the Iron Lady, both risking arrest warrants for alleged war crimes, from the International Court of Justice.
Back on Fleet Street, single file walking became gridlocked, and so we turned up Chancery Lane to make our way through Old London to Piccadilly Circus (Circle). We passed several illustrious institutions — the Royal Courts of Law, the Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales, the Church of St. Martin in the Fields, and a McDonald’s with small discrete Golden Arches. Also prominent was the world renown London School of Economics (LSE) which trains Brits for foreign service. Conspicuous in absence was any College of Diplomacy, Negotiation, and Statesmanship. Closest to the ideals of Athenian democracy and philosophic wisdom was Speaker’s Corner in Hyde Park near Marble Arch. But there, you are certain to be recorded by one of London’s ubiquitous surveillance cameras. As bad in the nation of the Magna Carta, Great Britain has no First Amendment guaranteeing freedom of speech and freedom of the press to all people, there is only Parliamentary Privilege for MPs while Parliament is in deliberation.
At present, Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron, with the able assistance of the beloved Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne, is continuing Maggie Thatcher’s work by trying to privatize the National Health Service. Lots of Luck, Mr. Cameron. If only Ed Miliband, the progressive leader of Labor, had more charisma.
Gadfly Replies Again
Dear Christine,
Thanks for your comments confirming the deeply felt unpopularity of Maggie Thatcher on the part of ordinary Brits. It’s good to hear that the British public has a good strong attention span and remembers the Iron Lady more accurately than most Americans’ glowing remembrance of Ronald Reagan. As to who came first, recall that Thatcher came to the PM position in 1979, two years before Reagan took the presidency. And to think, she never got the credit for being first to deregulate the economy and install greed as the national motto. Nor was she able to do away with the Labor Party or the National Health Service. Of course, Reagan didn’t have to contend with the American Labor Party or health as a human right.
Methinks we Americans could benefit from some British leadership on the progressive side of the political divide today, even allowing that a British critic may hold dual citizenship.
Peace and persuasion,
Mort Malkin
Thank you for your good coverage of two of the more eloquent Thatcher dissenters. What struck me forcibly in the UK at the time was the unalloyed bitterness of so very many people. Not a soul I spoke to – family member, friend, neighbor, acquaintance, many of whom I’d known only as very private in their politics – could refrain from inveighing against the woman, outraged at so much money spent on the funeral of someone merciless towards those she had thrown into poverty. I’ll not raise more than a puzzled eyebrow at your odd comments on colleges of this and that, even at your pronouncements on UK limitations on freedom of speech .(Heaven Help Us, not only do we not have Amendments, we don’t even have a Constitution!) But I would question your idea that Thatcher pointed the way for Reagan et al. Infatuation with unfettered money-making, overt rejection of a country’s social needs: regretfully, I don’t think those jollies had to be pointed out to an American politician . There’s sad validation for Thatcher’s frequently being called our first American prime minister. Whatever – we’ll just have to hope (and work) for a little more enlightenment on both sides of the Atlantic.
Gadfly Replies
Dear Martin,
Your comments are well taken. As to the question about a College of Peace, there was a rumor of a London Academy of International Studies and Diplomacy, but it mast have been hidden in some back alleyway or in the basement of a building, quite out of view. No, no Peace Academy that could question the former glory of the British Empire.
Peace and Parody,
Mort
Mort,
Thank you for your first hand account of the Thatcher funeral and parade. We were busy over here mourning the losses at Sandy Hook. Here are a couple of observations and a question:
– Dick Cheney and Henry Kissinger were perfect representatives of her American friends.
– Thatcher’s victory in the Falklands was a military victory even greater than
Reagan’s military victory in Grenada, she deserves credit. I only wish that Bush would have decided to invade the Maldives so he could have a great military victory. We might then be more interested in seeing that they don’t disappear under the rising sea level.
– As a grandson of a coal miner and a strong union supporter I can not give her credit in those areas.
And the question: Did you happen to see a College of Peace among all those other colleges you mentioned?